Managing an Estate When the Only Real Asset Is the Family Home

You've just lost a parent. The will names you executor. And as you sit at the kitchen table going through the paperwork, the reality sets in: the estate is basically the house. Maybe some super, a modest savings account, a few shares. But the real value, the thing that determines whether your siblings walk away with $200,000 or $600,000 each, is sitting under your feet.

And you don't all agree on what to do with it.

One sibling wants to keep the house. Another needs cash now. A third thinks you should rent it out and wait for the market to improve. You're stuck in the middle, legally responsible for getting this right, and every conversation feels like it might turn into an argument.

This is the reality for thousands of Australian executors and beneficiaries every year. When the family home is the estate's only real asset, you can't smooth over disagreements with cash from other sources. Every decision about the property is also a decision about who gets paid, when, and how much.

Let me walk you through what actually happens in this situation, what your options are, and how to make decisions that protect everyone without ending up in litigation.

Key Takeaways

  • The house being the only asset concentrates risk, decisions about selling, keeping or buying out siblings directly determine everyone's outcome, with no other assets to balance competing interests
  • Check title before making assumptions, joint tenancy means the property may bypass the estate entirely, while tenants in common or sole ownership means you'll need probate before anyone can act
  • Three realistic paths exist, sell through the estate and distribute cash, transfer to all beneficiaries as co-owners, or structure a buy-out where one or more beneficiaries buy the others out
  • Deadlock isn't permanent but it has costs, when siblings can't agree, executors can seek court directions or, in extreme cases, beneficiaries can apply for judicial sale orders
  • Tax and duty timing matters more than you think, capital gains tax exemptions and stamp duty concessions often depend on acting within specific timeframes, usually two years from death
  • Protect yourself as executor, get independent valuations, document every decision, keep beneficiaries informed, and don't favour one sibling over another without transparency and agreement

When the House Is the Estate: What That Actually Means

Let's be clear about what we're talking about.

An estate where "the house is the only real asset" doesn't necessarily mean the deceased owned nothing else. It means that once you account for funeral costs, outstanding debts, legal fees, and any specific bequests in the will, the family home represents essentially all of the distributable value.

You might have $40,000 in the bank, $15,000 in shares, and a superannuation death benefit that's already been paid directly to nominated beneficiaries. But the house is worth $1.8 million. Everything that matters, financially, hinges on what happens to that property.

This concentrates risk.

In estates with diverse assets, you can negotiate. One sibling takes the shares, another gets a larger portion of the cash, a third inherits the investment property. But when there's only one asset of real value, every beneficiary's outcome depends on the same decision: sell it, keep it, or buy each other out.

And that means emotions and competing interests collide with very little room to manoeuvre.

Key Point

When the house is the whole estate, you can't use other assets to balance competing interests. Every disagreement about the property becomes a disagreement about the entire inheritance. That's why clarity and process matter more here than in almost any other estate scenario.

Is the House Even Part of the Estate? Title and Ownership Basics

Before you start arguing about what to do with the property, you need to confirm something fundamental: is it actually in the estate?

This sounds obvious, but it catches people out constantly.

If your parents owned the house as joint tenants, the property passes automatically to the surviving owner when one dies. It doesn't form part of the deceased's estate. It doesn't get distributed under the will. The executor has no power over it.

So if your father dies and the house was held in joint tenancy with your mother, the property is now entirely hers. It won't be distributed to you and your siblings until she dies (and only if it's still in her name at that point). Adult children expecting to inherit "the house" based on what Dad's will says are often blindsided by this.

If the property was held as tenants in common, each owner holds a distinct share. When your father dies, his share forms part of his estate and passes according to his will (or intestacy rules if there's no will). That share can be distributed to beneficiaries, including potentially to your mother.

And if the deceased owned the property in sole name, the entire property forms part of the estate.

You need to know which scenario applies before you do anything else. Check the certificate of title or obtain a title search from the relevant state land registry. Look for how the ownership is described.

If you discover the house isn't in the estate because of joint tenancy, your role as executor (at least regarding this property) may be very limited. If the house is in the estate, you'll need to take the next step: obtaining authority to deal with it.

Expert Tip

Don't assume anything based on family conversations or what you think Mum or Dad intended. Pull the title. If you're the executor, this is one of the first documents you should have in front of you. It determines whether you need probate, whether you have any power over the property, and what your obligations actually are.

Who Can Make Decisions and When: Executors, Probate and Timing

You cannot sell, transfer, or mortgage real property from an estate until you have legal authority to do so. In practice, that means obtaining a grant of probate (if there's a will) or letters of administration (if there's no will).

This is not optional. It's not something you can shortcut because "everyone agrees". Land registries and purchasers' solicitors will require probate before they register a transfer or settle a sale.

The grant of probate is a court order that confirms the will is valid and that you, as the named executor, have the legal authority to administer the estate. Once you have it, you can sign contracts, transfer property, and distribute assets on behalf of the estate.

The process typically takes between two and six months, depending on the state, the complexity of the estate, and whether anyone challenges the will. In straightforward cases where all beneficiaries are cooperative and there are no disputes, you're looking at the shorter end. If someone files a caveat or contests the will, it can drag on much longer.

While you're waiting for probate, you're in a holding pattern. You can maintain the property, pay bills from estate funds if there are any, and have conversations with beneficiaries about what they want to do. But you can't bind the estate to a sale contract. You can't transfer title.

Once you have probate, you'll also need to lodge a transmission application with the land titles office in your state. This updates the title to show that the property is now held by you as executor, rather than by the deceased. Only then can you execute a contract to sell or transfer the property to beneficiaries.

So the timeline looks like this:

  1. Death occurs.
  2. You locate the will, gather estate information, apply for probate.
  3. Court grants probate (two to six months).
  4. You lodge transmission application to record your authority on title.
  5. You can now sell or transfer the property.

If siblings are pressuring you to "just sell it" or "put it on the market now", you need to explain this sequence. You don't have the power yet. And even if everyone is in perfect agreement, you still need probate before a purchaser can settle.

Key Point

Executors do not have unlimited power. You can't sell the family home just because you think it's the right decision. You need probate first. And once you have it, your duty is to act in the best interests of all beneficiaries, not just the loudest or most persuasive one. Document your decisions, keep beneficiaries informed, and never favour one sibling over another without a clear, defensible reason.

Three Practical Paths: Sell, Share or Buy Out

Once you have probate and the transmission application is sorted, you have three realistic options for dealing with the property. Each has different implications for timing, cash flow, tax, and family relationships.

Option 1: Sell the property through the estate and distribute the cash

This is the cleanest path when beneficiaries can't agree on anything else.

The executor lists the property for sale, conducts the sale process (usually through a real estate agent), and uses the sale proceeds to pay any outstanding estate debts, funeral costs, and legal fees. What's left is distributed to the beneficiaries according to the will.

Advantages:

  • Everyone gets cash. No one has to find financing or negotiate valuations.
  • The executor's job is simpler. You're not managing ongoing co-ownership or mediating buy-out disputes.
  • Tax treatment is usually straightforward. If the property was the deceased's main residence, capital gains tax exemptions often apply to the sale.

Disadvantages:

  • You're at the mercy of the property market. If it's a down market, selling immediately might mean accepting a lower price.
  • Emotional attachment. If one or more siblings want to keep the family home, forcing a sale can feel like a betrayal.
  • Sale costs. Real estate agent commissions, marketing, legal fees for settlement. These come out of the estate, reducing what beneficiaries ultimately receive.

But when there's genuine deadlock, when siblings fundamentally disagree on value or strategy, an estate sale is often the only realistic way forward.

Option 2: Transfer the property to all beneficiaries as co-owners

If the will says "I leave my house to my three children in equal shares", you can transfer the title so all three become registered proprietors as tenants in common.

This keeps the property in the family, at least initially. The siblings can then decide together whether to sell it later, rent it out, or one of them buy the others out down the track.

Advantages:

  • Defers the "what do we do with it" decision. Useful if emotions are still raw or if you're waiting for a better market.
  • Avoids the immediate pressure of a sale.
  • Potentially qualifies for nominal stamp duty on the transfer from the estate to the beneficiaries in some states.

Disadvantages:

  • You've just created a co-ownership arrangement between siblings. If they don't agree now, they're unlikely to agree later.
  • Ongoing costs. Rates, insurance, maintenance. Who pays? If one sibling lives in the house, do they pay rent to the others? These conversations often turn toxic.
  • Exit problems. When one sibling eventually wants out, you're back to negotiating a buy-out or forcing a sale. And by then, the relationship may be worse, not better.

I've seen co-ownership work when siblings are genuinely aligned, when there's a clear plan (e.g., "We'll rent it for two years then sell"), and when everyone can afford to contribute to holding costs. But I've also seen it collapse into bitter litigation within twelve months.

If you're considering this path, treat it like a business partnership. Put everything in writing: who's responsible for costs, how decisions get made, what triggers a sale, how buy-outs will be valued. Do not rely on "we'll sort it out as we go".

Option 3: One or more beneficiaries buy out the others

This is the path when one sibling genuinely wants to keep the house and can afford to buy the others out.

In practice, this means:

  1. You get an independent valuation of the property.
  2. The buying sibling offers to purchase the others' shares at that valuation (or they negotiate a price everyone accepts).
  3. The buying sibling arranges finance or pays cash.
  4. The executor transfers the property directly to the buying sibling (or the property is first transferred to all beneficiaries, then the buying sibling purchases the others' shares from them).
  5. The other beneficiaries receive their cash.

Advantages:

  • The house stays in the family if that matters to people.
  • Other beneficiaries get cash without the delay and cost of a public sale.
  • Clean break. The buying sibling owns the property outright, no ongoing co-ownership mess.

Disadvantages:

  • Financing. The buying sibling needs to either have cash or qualify for a mortgage large enough to buy out the others. Not everyone can do that, especially if they already have a mortgage on their own home.
  • Valuation disputes. What if the buying sibling thinks the house is worth $1.5 million but the others think it's worth $1.8 million? You need an independent valuer, and even then, people may not accept the result.
  • Perceived favouritism. Other siblings may feel the executor is "helping" the buying sibling by structuring the deal a certain way or offering flexible payment terms. This can breed resentment and, in extreme cases, claims that the executor breached their duties.

If you're the executor and one beneficiary wants to buy out the others, you need to be scrupulously fair. Insist on an independent valuation from a qualified valuer. Don't accept "I reckon it's worth X". Don't let the buying sibling delay or string out the transaction unless all parties agree to the timeline. And document everything.

Expert Tip

If you're the sibling who wants to keep the house, start getting your finances in order early. Talk to a mortgage broker before you make an offer to your siblings. Understand how much you can borrow, what deposit you'll need, and what the repayments look like. Nothing kills a buy-out faster than "I want to keep it" followed three months later by "Actually, I can't get finance".

Working Out a Fair Value and Documenting the Deal

Whether you're selling to a third party or one sibling is buying out the others, the question of value is critical. And when the house is the only real asset, getting this wrong exposes the executor to serious risk.

If you sell the property for less than market value, the beneficiaries who lose out can sue you personally for the shortfall. The argument will be that you breached your duty as executor by failing to obtain the best price reasonably available. And if you're also a beneficiary, the claim may be that you acted in your own interests rather than the estate's.

So how do you establish fair value?

Get an independent valuation

This is not optional. You need a formal valuation from a qualified, independent property valuer. Not a real estate agent's appraisal. Not "my mate who works in property reckons it's worth...". A proper valuation report.

If you're selling on the open market, you'll usually get this anyway as part of the agent's process or at the purchaser's request. But if you're doing a sibling buy-out, you need the valuation upfront, before any offers are made.

The valuation should be addressed to the executor and all beneficiaries. It should be based on current market conditions, comparable sales, and the property's actual condition. And everyone should have a copy.

If beneficiaries still can't agree on value even with a valuation in hand, you have a few options:

  • Obtain a second valuation from a different valuer and average the two.
  • Market the property for sale and let the market determine value (this only works if you're willing to actually sell).
  • Apply to court for directions on how to proceed.

Most disputes over value resolve once an independent, professional valuation lands. It takes emotion out of the equation. But not always.

Document the buy-out arrangement

If one sibling is buying out the others, do not rely on a handshake.

You need a written agreement that sets out:

  • The purchase price.
  • The payment terms (lump sum, or staged payments if everyone agrees).
  • The timeline for settlement.
  • Who pays for what costs (transfer duty, legal fees, valuation costs).
  • What happens if the buying sibling can't get finance or defaults.

In some cases, the agreement will be between the executor and the buying beneficiary. In others, it's between the beneficiaries themselves (if the property has already been transferred to all of them as co-owners).

Either way, get a lawyer to draft it. This is not a situation where you want to rely on a template you found online.

Understand the tax and duty implications

This isn't a tax advice column, but you need to know the basics so you can ask the right questions.

Capital gains tax: If the property was the deceased's main residence and you sell it within two years of death, the estate is usually exempt from CGT on the sale. If you hold it longer, or if the property was an investment property, CGT may apply to any gain since the date of death.

Stamp duty: Most Australian states offer concessional (often nominal) transfer duty when property is transferred from a deceased estate to beneficiaries under a will. But if you then transfer the property from one beneficiary to another as part of a buy-out, normal stamp duty may apply to that second transaction.

The interplay between these taxes can affect the structure of a buy-out. For example, it might be cheaper from a duty perspective to transfer the property directly from the executor to the buying sibling (if the will allows it) rather than transferring to all beneficiaries first, then executing a buy-out.

This is where you need advice from a lawyer and an accountant who specialise in estates. The goal is to structure the transaction so everyone gets their entitlement, the tax bill is minimised, and no one gets an unexpected stamp duty assessment six months later.

Key Point

A fair price isn't what the buying sibling can afford or what the other siblings hope to get. It's what an independent, qualified valuer says the property is worth. If you're the executor, that valuation is your shield. If beneficiaries disagree with it, the problem is between them and the valuer, not you.

When You Can't Agree: From Negotiation to Legal Intervention

Now let's talk about what happens when siblings simply cannot agree on what to do with the house.

One wants to sell. One wants to keep it. One wants to wait six months for the market to improve. And you, as executor, are stuck trying to move forward while everyone digs in.

First, understand that deadlock happens. Often. Family relationships are complicated, estates bring out the worst in people, and when money is involved, emotions run high. The question is not whether you'll face disagreement. It's how you manage it when you do.

Try structured negotiation first

Before anyone talks about court, sit everyone down (or get them on a video call) and try structured negotiation.

This means:

  • Circulating the independent valuation to everyone.
  • Asking each beneficiary to put their preferred outcome in writing, with reasons.
  • Exploring whether anyone's position can shift. For example, if the buying sibling can't afford the full buy-out now, would the others accept staged payments over two years?
  • Identifying common ground. Maybe everyone agrees the house should be sold, but they disagree on timing. Can you agree on a maximum holding period before listing it?

If you can get everyone to at least acknowledge the constraints (the executor needs probate, the estate has debts to pay, CGT exemptions expire after two years), sometimes that's enough to break the deadlock.

Consider mediation

If direct negotiation isn't working, mediation is often the next step. A trained mediator facilitates a conversation between the beneficiaries, helping them explore options and reach agreement without a judge deciding for them.

Mediation is cheaper and faster than litigation. It's also confidential. And because the mediator doesn't impose a solution, the beneficiaries retain control of the outcome.

Many estate disputes settle at mediation because once everyone is in a room with a neutral third party, the emotional heat drops and people start focusing on what's actually achievable.

What executors can and cannot do during deadlock

As executor, you have a duty to administer the estate. That includes, where necessary, making decisions about estate assets even if beneficiaries don't all agree.

But your power isn't unlimited.

You can:

  • Decide to sell the property if you reasonably believe it's in the best interests of the estate (for example, to pay debts, or because holding it is costing money the estate doesn't have).
  • Obtain valuations and other professional advice.
  • Apply to court for directions if you're unsure how to proceed.

You cannot:

  • Favour one beneficiary over another without a legitimate reason.
  • Ignore the terms of the will. If the will says "I leave my house to my three children equally", you can't just transfer it to one of them because they're the loudest.
  • Unreasonably delay. If you sit on the decision for two years because you don't want to upset people, you're breaching your duties as executor.

If you're genuinely stuck, the safest path is to apply to court for judicial advice or directions. You're essentially asking the court: "The beneficiaries can't agree. What should I do?" The court will give you an answer, and provided you follow that answer, you're protected from later claims.

When beneficiaries can force a sale

In extreme cases, a beneficiary who wants the property sold can apply to court for an order for sale.

This typically happens when:

  • The executor refuses to act or is dragging their feet.
  • One or more beneficiaries are blocking a sale for no legitimate reason.
  • The estate is incurring ongoing costs (rates, insurance, maintenance) and there's no cash to pay them.

The court has broad powers to order a sale if it's in the best interests of the estate or if it's necessary to give effect to the rights of the beneficiaries. These applications aren't cheap and they take time, but they're sometimes the only way to break a deadlock.

Expert Tip

If you're an executor facing deadlock, document everything. Every email, every conversation, every decision. If you end up in court, you'll need to show that you acted reasonably, that you considered everyone's interests, and that you didn't favour one sibling over another. Good records are your best defence.

Tax, Stamp Duty and Timing: The Issues to Weigh Up

You don't need to become a tax expert, but you do need to understand the rough implications of timing and structure. Because when the house is the only real asset, tax and duty costs come straight out of what the beneficiaries receive.

Capital gains tax on inherited property

When someone dies, there's no immediate CGT liability on the transfer of assets to their estate. But CGT can arise later, when the estate or the beneficiaries dispose of the asset.

If the property was the deceased's main residence at the time of death and you sell it within two years, the estate is generally exempt from CGT. The logic: you're disposing of what was their home, and the main residence exemption still applies.

If the property wasn't their main residence (for example, it was an investment property or holiday house), or if you hold it for longer than two years before selling, CGT may apply to any gain in value from the date of death to the date of sale.

Beneficiaries who inherit property and later sell it in their own names also need to consider CGT. If you inherit your parents' house, move into it and make it your main residence, you may be entitled to exemptions when you eventually sell. But if you inherit it and keep it as an investment, CGT will apply when you sell, calculated from the date of death value.

The two-year window matters. If you're planning to sell the property, doing it within two years of death often minimises the tax bill. If you're doing a sibling buy-out, the timing of that transaction can also affect the CGT treatment.

Stamp duty on transfers from deceased estates

Most Australian states offer concessional or nominal transfer duty when property passes from a deceased estate to beneficiaries under a will.

For example, in Victoria and NSW, transfers to beneficiaries named in a will are typically subject only to nominal duty (a small fixed fee, often under $200). But this concession usually only applies to the initial transfer from the estate to the beneficiaries.

If you then transfer the property from one beneficiary to another (as part of a buy-out), that second transaction may attract normal stamp duty calculated on the full market value of the property.

In Queensland, similar concessions exist for transfers to beneficiaries, but again, a subsequent buy-out between beneficiaries is treated as a normal dutiable transaction.

The lesson: structure matters. If you're planning a buy-out, talk to a lawyer about whether it makes sense to transfer the property directly from the executor to the buying sibling (if the will's terms permit it) rather than transferring to all beneficiaries first. The difference can be tens of thousands of dollars in duty.

Timing and holding costs

Every month you hold the property, the estate incurs costs: council rates, insurance, maintenance, possibly interest if there's a mortgage. If the estate has no cash and the house is the only asset, someone has to pay those costs out of pocket and hope to be reimbursed later.

This creates pressure to move quickly. But moving too quickly (for example, accepting a low offer just to get the sale done) can cost more than a few months of holding costs.

The right balance depends on the circumstances:

  • If the market is strong and you have multiple interested buyers, sell.
  • If the market is soft but the estate has no cash and debts are piling up, you may have no choice but to sell anyway.
  • If you can afford to hold for six months and there's a reasonable expectation that values will recover, waiting might make sense. But only if all beneficiaries agree and you're not breaching your duties by delaying.
Key Point

Tax and duty can't drive the decision on their own, but ignoring them is expensive. Before you settle on sell, hold, or buy out, get advice on the CGT and stamp duty implications of each option. And if you're going to act, do it within two years of death if at all possible. That deadline matters more than most people realise.

Practical Next Steps: What to Do in the First 90 Days

You've just been appointed executor, or you've just found out you're one of several beneficiaries, and the family home is effectively the whole estate. What do you actually do?

Here's a simple roadmap for the first 90 days.

Week 1 to 2: Gather information and confirm ownership

  • Obtain a copy of the death certificate.
  • Locate the will (if there is one). If you're the named executor, read it carefully.
  • Pull a copy of the certificate of title or order a title search. Confirm whether the property is held in sole name, joint tenants, or tenants in common.
  • Identify any mortgages, caveats, or other encumbrances on the property.
  • List any other significant assets and liabilities in the estate: bank accounts, super, debts, funeral costs.

At this point, you're just mapping the landscape. Don't make any promises to beneficiaries about what they're going to receive. You don't know yet.

Week 2 to 4: Secure the property and manage immediate costs

  • Ensure the property is insured. If the deceased's home and contents policy has lapsed, arrange estate insurance immediately.
  • Secure the property. Change locks if necessary, especially if there's any risk of dispute over possession.
  • Pay urgent bills from estate funds if they exist (council rates, insurance). If there's no cash in the estate, document who's paying what out of pocket so they can be reimbursed later.
  • If someone is living in the property (for example, a surviving spouse or an adult child), clarify their status. Are they a beneficiary with a right to live there, or are they occupying it informally? This will matter later.

Week 4 to 8: Apply for probate or letters of administration

  • Engage a lawyer to prepare the probate application. Do not try to do this yourself unless the estate is very simple and you're confident navigating court forms.
  • Gather supporting documents: the original will, death certificate, details of assets and liabilities, identification for the executor.
  • File the application with the Supreme Court in your state.
  • Wait. Probate typically takes 8 to 12 weeks if there are no complications.

While you're waiting, start having conversations with the beneficiaries about what they want to do with the property. Listen. Take notes. Don't commit to anything yet, but get a sense of where everyone stands.

Week 8 to 12: Obtain valuation and explore options

  • Once probate is close to being granted (or immediately after you receive it), commission an independent valuation of the property.
  • Share the valuation with all beneficiaries.
  • Present the three options: sell through the estate, transfer to all beneficiaries, or buy-out.
  • If one beneficiary wants to buy out the others, ask them to confirm they can secure finance. Don't waste time negotiating a buy-out with someone who can't actually fund it.
  • If everyone agrees on a path, document it. If they don't, consider whether mediation or further negotiation is needed.

After 90 days: Execute the agreed plan or seek legal advice on deadlock

If you have consensus, move forward. List the property for sale, instruct lawyers to prepare transfer documents for a buy-out, or formalise the co-ownership arrangement.

If you don't have consensus, don't sit on it. The longer you delay, the more exposed you are as executor and the more relationships deteriorate. Either push harder for mediation or apply to court for directions.

The first 90 days are about information, authority, and clarity. If you can get those three things right, the rest of the process becomes much easier.

Expert Tip

As executor, your job in the first 90 days is to create options, not make final decisions. Gather the facts, get the valuation, present the paths. Let the beneficiaries tell you what they want. Your role is to make the decision they agree on happen, or if they can't agree, to seek directions on how to move forward. Do not try to be the hero who solves everything. Be the project manager who keeps things moving.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can an executor force the sale of the family home if beneficiaries don't agree?

In some circumstances, yes. If the executor reasonably believes selling the property is in the best interests of the estate (for example, to pay debts, avoid ongoing holding costs, or give effect to the will), they can proceed with a sale even if some beneficiaries object. But the executor must act fairly, obtain proper valuations, and ideally seek legal advice or court directions if there's serious disagreement. Executors who sell property against beneficiaries' wishes without good reason risk being sued for breach of duty.

What if one sibling is living in the house and refuses to leave?

This is messy and requires legal advice specific to your situation. If the sibling is a beneficiary and the will entitles them to a share of the property, they may have some right to occupy it temporarily. But if the executor needs to sell the property to pay debts or distribute the estate, they can apply to court for vacant possession. If the sibling is not a beneficiary and has no legal right to be there, the executor can take steps to remove them, but this often requires court orders. Do not change the locks or cut off utilities without legal advice. That can backfire badly.

Do we have to sell the house within two years to avoid capital gains tax?

No. The two-year rule is about eligibility for the main residence exemption from CGT. If the property was the deceased's main residence and you sell it within two years of death, the estate is generally exempt from CGT. If you sell after two years, the exemption may not apply and CGT may be payable on any increase in value from the date of death to the date of sale. But there are exceptions and other concessions, so get advice from an accountant. You won't go to jail if you sell after two years, you just might pay more tax.

Can we avoid stamp duty if one sibling buys out the others?

It depends on how you structure it and which state you're in. If the property is transferred from the estate directly to the buying sibling under the terms of the will, you may qualify for concessional or nominal duty. But if the property is first transferred to all beneficiaries and then one buys out the others, that second transaction is often treated as a normal property purchase and attracts full stamp duty. Talk to a lawyer before you commit to a structure. The duty bill can be significant and it's often avoidable with the right approach.

What happens if the house has a mortgage and there's no cash in the estate to pay it off?

The mortgage usually has to be paid from the sale proceeds of the property. If you sell, the bank gets paid out at settlement and the beneficiaries receive what's left. If one sibling wants to keep the property, they'll need to either refinance the mortgage into their own name or arrange a new loan that pays out the estate's mortgage. If there's no cash in the estate and the mortgage repayments are due, the executor may need to sell the property quickly to avoid default and repossession.

How do we work out who pays the rates and insurance while we're deciding what to do?

Ideally, these costs are paid from estate funds. But if there's no cash in the estate, someone will have to pay them and claim reimbursement later from the sale proceeds or distributions. The executor should keep detailed records of who paid what. If one beneficiary is living in the property, it's reasonable to expect them to contribute to (or cover) the holding costs, but this should be agreed in writing. If you can't agree, this is another reason to move quickly towards a sale or transfer rather than letting the property sit in limbo.


Litigation is complex, yes. But the pathway shouldn't be.

When the family home is the only real asset in the estate, every decision matters. Sell, hold, or buy out. Fair value or favouritism. Clarity or deadlock. The choices you make in the first few months will determine whether this is a straightforward estate administration or a multi-year dispute.

If you're an executor, your job is to create transparency, obtain independent advice, and move the estate forward even when beneficiaries can't agree. If you're a beneficiary, your job is to engage constructively, accept professional valuations, and recognise that your siblings have the same legal entitlements you do.

And if you're stuck, if the conversations have broken down, or if you're worried you're about to make a decision you can't undo, talk to a lawyer who understands estate disputes. Not next month. Now.


Disclaimer: This article provides general information only and does not constitute legal advice. Estate law, tax law and duties legislation vary by state and by individual circumstances. Before making any decisions about selling, transferring or buying out interests in estate property, you should obtain advice from a qualified lawyer and accountant based on your specific situation.

Michael
About the Author Michael
Michael Buscema is a tax litigator with rare positioning to help clients resolve complex disputes with the ATO and SRO. For 11 years prior to joining Aptum, Michael worked for the ATO and Commonwealth Treasury, holding a range of senior positions including acting Assistant Commissioner of the ATO. Michael works with listed companies and private wealthy groups to achieve outcomes in areas such as R&D, depreciation of intangibles, Part IVA, and valuation disputes. Michael supports clients to make confident decisions throughout the lifecycle of a tax dispute, including at audit, objection, reviews to the ART and appeals to the Federal... read more

Get immediate clarity in your dispute.